Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

How to license Windows RT tablets connecting to a virtual desktop

When it comes to licensing, Windows RT tablets get a free ride when connecting to a virtual desktop, but there are still some caveats.

Windows RT tablets can access virtual desktops without additional licenses -- but there's a catch … or three.

In presentations, I've asked hundreds of people whether they'll deploy Windows 8 on corporate desktops, and less than five have raised their hand. However, another show of hands shows that more people are interested in the mobility aspect of Windows 8, in particular the Surface tablets. It seems that if Microsoft isn't getting Windows 8 into corporations one way, it will in another.

The Surface Pro is Microsoft's least notable new tablet; it runs Windows 8, plain and simple. Its main advantage over its sister product, the Surface RT tablet, is that it can run real Windows applications because it's built on Intel hardware.

The Surface RT, on the other hand, is an ARM-based device, running a derivative OS called Windows RT that looks like Windows 8 but comes without the flexibility you would expect of Windows. Since it's an ARM device, it can't run traditional applications or even be managed in a traditional way -- it can't even join a domain!

What the Surface RT tablet can do, though, is run Windows 8 apps from the Windows Store (only ones that run in the Metro interface) and connect to virtual desktops. Plus, it can connect to VDI without needing to buy an additional license. Microsoft has essentially bundled its new Companion Device License (CDL) with the Windows RT OS that runs on the tablet. That represents a savings of up to $99 per year when compared to using an iPad or Android tablet to access a virtual desktop, which requires Microsoft's Virtual Desktop Access license or CDL.

What's the catch?

There are, however, a few caveats to licensing Windows RT tablets. First, this "freebie" only applies if a user's primary computer has Software Assurance (SA). This isn't really all that different from anything else Microsoft does. You need SA to connect to a virtual desktop anyway, and if the machine you're using doesn't have SA, you have to purchase a VDA license.

More on Windows RT tablets

Quiz: What do you know about Windows 8 and RT?

Analyzing whether Windows RT suits the enterprise

Explaining Windows RT security

When you do that, you're entitled to purchase a CDL that allows you to use up to four additional devices to connect to a virtual desktop. I'm not saying it's the right thing to do, I'm just saying it's not new.

Note that this licensing only applies to VDI-connected desktops. Remote Desktop Services (RDS) licensing requirements have not changed, although the price has gone up for per-user licenses as of late last year. If you're accessing RDS remote desktops, you still need to purchase a device or user-based RDS CAL, but you don't need SA or VDA licenses. If your users have multiple devices, it makes sense to purchase the user-based CAL, despite the price increase.

The other issue with Windows RT tablets is one I just learned about: The "free" license to access VDI desktops only applies if the Surface RT is purchased and owned by the company. I don't expect too many people got Surface RT tablets for Christmas, let alone brought them to work and asked IT to connect them to their virtual desktop. But if they did, they would be in violation of the license agreement. This caveat is not to be overlooked if you're considering embracing the tablet.

When you boil it down, you can indeed find a situation where Surface RT tablets (and other devices running Windows RT) can be used to access virtual desktops without additional licensing. You just have to be accessing a VDI desktop (not RDS) from a device your company purchased for you -- when you're not using the desktop that the company bought for you with SA on it. That sure takes the shine off the "free access" feature, doesn't it?

Dig Deeper on Virtual desktop management

Join the conversation


Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

Is it worth licensing a Windows RT tablet to connect to a virtual desktop?
I've been dealing with MS for the past couple of months. It is the most confusing, convoluted junk I've ever seen. I believe MS can sell more licenses and/or collect on non-compliant companies by doing one basic thing, start shifting to per user licensing and quick. I get that the Windows OS needs to be paid for on a device like a Laptop or RT on a tablet, but they can save more by making the model simpler.
Licensing model to complicated. The Ower purchase device is a game changer as well
Wait "this "freebie" only applies if a user's primary computer has Software Assurance (SA). "
If you're main computer already has a SA then you can use Windows8 full, ipad, android regardless I thought.
From Microsoft: "Windows Virtual Desktop
Access Allows a licensed device to access virtual desktop infrastructure and allows the single, primary user to remotely access their desktop from third-party devices such as home or contractor-owned PCs."
You're SA agreement has 1 RDS license.
I think I understand this article now but its a MS failure. A company is supposed to buy a CDL (companion) for personal devices used that are not RT devices. How can an administrator or manager be responsible for a PERSONAL device?! Answer: THEY CAN NOR SHOULDNT! The extra license is only if the company buys devices that are not RT for its users as remote thin client. Answer: admins give them a stipend to buy what they want and ignore. Also this is CANNOT BE ENFORCED as its an anti-competitive act. If you have SA and WYSE or other thin clients, you don't need to buy CDL licenses. So you cant charge one company additional licenses but not others. END OF STORY!!