Q
Evaluate Weigh the pros and cons of technologies, products and projects you are considering.

Which VDI client has the best long-term viability?

Using physical desktops, thin clients and HTML5 browsers are all good options for delivering VDI. Organizations are best off choosing the most cost-effective approach.

Using an HTML5 browser is the best option for delivering virtual desktops because it's cheap and will remain widely...

available long into the future.

Choosing a VDI client can be confusing because of all the options out there, and the differences between clients are generally subtle. First you have thin clients, which are hardware terminals that include minimal storage and applications. Zero clients take it a step further and contain no local storage, existing solely to connect to a host server. You can also repurpose traditional PCs and laptops into thin clients by installing software that creates a separate remote desktop environment. HTML5 clients, which reside on a server instead of locally on the device, provide remote desktop access through a Web browser.

Now that you know the options, let's take a look at the pros and cons of these clients and how HTML5 browsers come out on top.

Comparing the VDI client options

All VDI clients should be able to restrict corporate data storage on the client device, provide consistent desktop availability to the user and perform as well as a physical PC would. Most clients on the market today meet those requirements, so the major differentiators left among VDI clients are price and how long they'll last.

Repurposed PCs are the most expensive VDI client to manage, given the cost of the PC and the fact that IT still has to maintain and update traditional computers that may no longer be in tip-top shape. Thin clients and zero clients are less expensive, but you don't get the best bang for your buck because they aren't manufactured in the same volume as PCs.

For the best virtual desktop performance at the lowest price, the clear winner is an HTML5 client. HTML5 clients provide a device-agnostic approach, allowing users to access virtual desktops through HTML5 browsers, which nearly all computing devices have access to. In fact, any display with a browser capability is often good enough, so we'll even see TVs, monitors and projectors capable of displaying virtual desktops. Although using an HTML5 browser is a newer approach than the rest of the options, most VDI products support HTML5 clients.

The low price and compatibility with mobile devices make HTML5 browsers the best option for delivering VDI. Companies such as Google support the HTML5 approach, offering virtual desktop access through Chrome Remote Desktop. Plus, HTML5 clients still provide enough power to run resource-intensive programs such as Adobe Creative Cloud.

HTML5 browsers are so mainstream today that they will certainly keep up with network capabilities, making them a strong option for the future.

Next Steps

HTML5 clients provide a versatile VDI option

Drawbacks of using HTML5 clients for VDI

What are the benefits of using thin clients?

Will HTML5 replace flash?

This was last published in November 2015

Dig Deeper on Virtual desktop infrastructure and architecture

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Join the conversation

2 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

Which type of VDI client do you think is best positioned for the future?
Cancel
Hi Jim,

You make a good point that it is a good choice for cost effective option. I am not sure if it is the best position for the future as will it provide all features such as local USB access, high quality video, 3D or 4K display. Every environment is different and user needs are different. Having choice is good as one size does not fit all. I do believe that HTML5 will get there and it will be a strong technology for most basic use case.  Time will see.

Thanks,

KL
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchEnterpriseDesktop

SearchServerVirtualization

SearchCloudComputing

SearchVMware

Close