Pano Logic goes out of business, forgets to tell customers

Virtual desktop vendor Pano Logic unexpectedly went out of business, leaving users wondering what to do next.

Pano Logic, a small virtual desktop vendor, has unexpectedly gone out of business, according to the company's former...

San Francisco-based public relations firm.

The company, headquartered in Redwood City, Calif., laid off its employees on Oct. 23, but there has been confusion among users, who are unable to get in touch with Pano Logic about what to do next and whether there would be a support plan going forward.

"If you are lucky and have a good reseller, you might get support for a year or two from them while IT works out a transition plan," said Simon Bramfitt, founder of Entelechy, a Concord, Calif.-based research firm. "But customers are in a bit of an awkward spot. It's going to be a bumpy challenge."

Pano Logic could not be reached for comment and has yet to issue a public confirmation that it is no longer in business, although its website is now missing the management and investor sections. Nervous customers have been reduced to leaving unanswered messages on Pano Logic's Facebook page.

Pano System not easy to replace

The problem for customers is that Pano Logic's virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) product was significantly different from other tools on the market. Pano System was an end-to-end solution that will require IT departments to replace the entire VDI environment and not just a few components, Bramfitt said.

Pano Logic, founded in 2006, provided both the virtual hardware and software all within Pano System. Its zero client Pano Device, which contains no storage, no processors and no software, allowed IT to move all computing to the data center or cloud. The devices connected back to the data center through an Ethernet connection, making it easy to maintain and manage virtual desktops.

More about Pano Logic

Q&A with Pano Logic CEO John Kish

Zero client technology overview

Pano Logic's approach was to offer dedicated thin clients that only work with its data center software technology. Its dedicated connection broker could interact with all the major hypervisors, including Citrix XenServer, Microsoft Hyper-V and VMware vSphere, but those connections were still dependent on Pano Logic software to do the intermediation.

"Organizations aren't going to be able to spin up a competing solution in a reasonable amount of time, not without a lot of planning or headaches," Bramfitt said. He noted that the company was considered a small player in the virtual desktop space compared to the likes of Citrix Systems Inc. and VMware, but it offered innovative ideas well beyond those competitors.

At $149 to $169, plus a license for the server software, Pano's virtual desktop computing was aggressively priced compared to other options, including the purchase of traditional fat Windows PCs that are inexpensive to buy but costly to maintain over their lifetimes.

"The only good news from this perspective is it wasn't a high-cost solution, so organizations won't lose a great deal of capital," Bramfitt said.

Still, that's little consolation to IT departments that must now figure out a quick transition plan for their virtual desktop environments, he added.

Dig Deeper on Virtual desktop management

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation

24 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

If your virtual desktop vendor went out of business, what would be your next move?
Cancel
Transition to ClearCube
Cancel
Never cared for Pano anyway, it was forced on us.
Cancel
We almost bought their starter kit with 5 Pano devices etc. Good thing we did a double take and decided not to ;-)
Cancel
This is the only problem with not using Citrix or VMWare for VDI. It seems like they either buy everyone or a lot of the other companies are having problems competing.
Cancel
Cry myself to sleep at night.
Cancel
harvest the user profiles using profile unity - then proceed with another VDI solution, or manage the profiles, data, and apps from the data center and put inexpensive windows endpoints at the users fingertips.
Cancel
I went to Pano's website, and there are no signs of any problems, winning deals as recent as Oct 22nd. Are these reports founded on fact?
Cancel
Not Cool! I'm glad I'm a vmware customer.
Cancel
If the conjecture is correct, this appears to be an issue of a jealous competitor suing them into oblivion. It was a great product and had all the indicators of knocking the PC market into the dirt. ...just ask yourself, who had the most to gain from seeing this company crash and burn so spectacularly?
Cancel
The new "distributed" model of desktop virtualization is the best and most sustainable approach.
Cancel
Try and find a way to buy the IP and inventory
Cancel
Microsoft Surface Pro
Cancel
PANIC
Cancel
We are going back to Desktops
Cancel
PCoIP
Cancel
Teradici PCoIP baby!
Cancel
Hopefully pano logic will live on through another company but until then hopefully my devices don't go awall while I'm left to find another, maintenanced, solution.
Cancel
PCoIP to go! ZC, HP-optimized client. rock on...
Cancel
Cheap low priced laptops, android tablets or thin client can replace the pano and keep using the vertual desktop infrastructure.
Cancel
Go back to PCs.
Cancel
View and PCoIP; looking at Zero Client end points for easy maintenance.
Cancel
It's time to move to a more open architecture solution. Something that doesn't lock you in.
Cancel
ride it till it breaks
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchEnterpriseDesktop

SearchServerVirtualization

SearchCloudComputing

SearchConsumerization

SearchVMware

Close