Access your Pro+ Content below.
Desktop virtualization comparison: VDI vs. Remote Desktop Services
This article is part of the August 2012, Vol. 40 issue of Virtual Data Center
For desktop virtualization in your organization, you can take the VDI route or the Remote Desktop Services route -- or you could go with a combo. Microsoft Remote Desktop Services (RDS), previously called Terminal Services, has been with us for 15 years. Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), on the other hand, is still getting its engine going in many organizations. To help you choose the right path for your environment, see how VDI and RDS stack up against one another in this desktop virtualization comparison. What's the difference? Microsoft Remote Desktop Services and VDI are each suited to different scenarios. VDI has a separate virtual machine (VM) for each user and uses a desktop operating system in that VM. It puts isolation between users, so VDI is better for highly regulated or secured environments where information disclosure is a big issue. That also means you have lots of copies of Windows to keep clean and safe. Plus, you have to deal with mass VM boots and updates, which can drain VDI storage performance. More on ...
Features in this issue
Desktop as a Service is an up-and-coming trend in IT, but cloud-hosted desktops present some obstacles, such as DaaS licensing and security. See what other issues made our list.
Once you choose DaaS, take a structured approach to ensure success.
For desktop virtualization, you have a choice between the paths of VDI and Remote Desktop Services. Robert Frost took the road less travelled, but you don't have to choose just one.
Columns in this issue
As VMware’s VMworld 2012 show approaches, we’re hearing about vSphere 5.1 features, company acquisitions and the big news of VMware CEO Paul Maritz’s departure.