Premium Content

Access "Nonpersistent vs. persistent desktops: Why VDI should persist"

Published: 05 Apr 2013

Want your VDI project to be a success? Choose persistent desktops. In the world of virtual desktop infrastructure, there are two basic kinds of desktops: persistent (also called personal or one-to-one) and nonpersistent (also called shared or many-to-one). Many VDI proponents claim that nonpersistent desktops are the way to go because they're easier to manage than persistent VDI. With nonpersistent, a single disk image is shared among many users. As each user logs in, he or she gets a clone of the shared master desktop, and then that clone is customized on demand with app virtualization (Microsoft App-V, VMware ThinApp, etc.) or with user environment virtualization (AppSense, RES, etc.). While this seems like a great concept, the unfortunate reality is that it's impossible to virtualize every single app and user setting with these tools. For example, how do you handle new apps the user wants to install? They can't install to the master image since that's the image that's used for everyone, and they can't install into their own clone because the app would be ... Access >>>

Access TechTarget
Premium Content for Free.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

What's Inside

Features

More Premium Content Accessible For Free

  • Cloud migration confidential
    MI_0914.png
    E-Zine

    Any cloud migration strategy will likely start with a good dose of preparation, say experts in the cover story for the September issue of Modern ...

  • DevOps tools for workload management
    devops_tools_workload.png
    E-Handbook

    Workload automation and streamlined management are essential to support fast-changing business applications and a hybrid or private cloud computing ...

  • The processor problem: One size doesn't fit
    processor_problem.png
    E-Handbook

    Conventional x86 processors try to do everything, but they are power hungry and performance inefficient. Stripping down processors to get the ...