Q

What can I do to reduce the heavy load on my Terminal Server?

I've got 15-20 heavy users on a LAN using Windows Server 2003 and XP as clients. I am using this as a Terminal Server. The students in my class often run multimedia-intensive content. What would be wiser - getting a Pentium with hyperthreading (3.06 with 800 fsb) or Load Balancing with another box the same as I already have (Athlon XP 2200)? Is it possible that these two actions will not give enough return to warrant the expense for my 15-20 users? Here's the present system: Athlon XP 2200, 2 GB Ram, 10/100 PCI NICs.
I can't really comment on whether it's worth it expense-wise, but if this current (powerful) configuration isn't doing it for you then I'd try adding another box. Processor power and memory are only among the possible bottlenecks for a Terminal Server, and also adding a second box gives you a fall-back position in case something happens to the single Terminal Server.

If you're using MetaFrame, you might also consider using content publishing to remove some of the load from the Terminal Servers and put it on the clients. MetaFrame XP FR3 also has some media-supporting capabilities that could come in handy.

This was first published in November 2003
This Content Component encountered an error

Pro+

Features

Enjoy the benefits of Pro+ membership, learn more and join.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchEnterpriseDesktop

SearchServerVirtualization

SearchCloudComputing

SearchConsumerization

SearchVMware

Close